On 10/16/2013 06:59 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Alessandro Pilotti wrote: >> On Oct 16, 2013, at 13:19 , Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org >>> The other two alternatives are to accept the delays and work within Nova >>> (slowly building the trust that will give you more autonomy), or ship it >>> as a separate add-on that does not come with nova-core's signature on it. >> >> I never asked for a nova signature on it. My only requirerement is that >> the project would be part of OpenStack and not an external project, even >> if this means passing 2 releases in incubation on stackforge as long as >> it can become part of the OpenStack core group of projects afterwards >> (if it meets the required OpenStack criteria of course). >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewProjects > > That's a possible outcome of the second alternative I described above. > The separate add-on could apply to the incubation track and potentially > be made a part of the integrated release.
Yep, it's certainly a possible outcome. You could ask the soon to be elected TC to give an opinion. But honestly, if I am on the TC, I would vote against it. It doesn't make any sense for Nova to include a bunch of drivers, but one driver be separate but still an official project. I think drivers need to be treated equally in this regard, and I think the majority consensus is that it's best overall to have them in the tree. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev