On 10/24/2013 10:52 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > > > On 10/24/13 4:46 PM, "Dan Smith" <d...@danplanet.com> wrote: > >>> In the last meeting we discussed an idea that I think is worth trying at >>> least for icehouse-1 to see if we like it or not. The idea is that >>> *every* blueprint starts out at a Low priority, which means "best >>> effort, but no promises". For a blueprint to get prioritized higher, it >>> should have 2 nova-core members signed up to review the resulting code. >> >> Huge +1 to this. I'm in favor of the whole plan, but specifically the >> prioritization piece is very important, IMHO. > > I too am in favor of the idea. It is just not clear how 2 Nova cores will > be signed up.
Good point, there was no detail on that. I propose just comments on the blueprint whiteboard. It can be something simple like this to indicate that Dan and I have agreed to review the code for something: "nova-core reviewers: russellb, dansmith" -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev