Russell Bryant wrote:
> At the last Nova meeting we started talking about some updates to the
> Nova blueprint process for the Icehouse cycle.  I had hoped we could
> talk about and finalize this in a Nova design summit session on "Nova
> Project Structure and Process" [1], but I think we need to push forward
> on finalizing this as soon as possible so that it doesn't block current
> work being done.
> Here is a first cut at the process.  Let me know what you think is
> missing or should change.  I'll get the result of this thread posted on
> the wiki.
> [...]


That's pretty much how I would like every project to handle their
blueprints. For smaller projects I guess the "2 core signed up for
>=Medium blueprints" requirement can be handled informally, but the rest
is spot-on and should be applicable everywhere.

Thierry Carrez (ttx)

OpenStack-dev mailing list

Reply via email to