On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13 2013, John Griffith wrote: > >> Trivial or not, people use it and frankly I don't see any value at all >> in removing it. As far as the "some projects want a different format >> of UUID" that doesn't make a lot of sense to me but if that's what >> somebody wants they should write their own method. I strongly agree >> with others with respect to the comments around code-churn. I see >> little value in this. > > The thing is that code in oslo-incubator is supposed to be graduated to > standalone Python library. > > We see little value in a library providing a library for a helper doing > str(uuid.uuid4()).
Well I see your point, probably should've never been there in the first place :) Although I suppose it is good to have some form of standarization for something no matter how trivial. Anyway, my opinion is it seems like unnecessary churn but I do see your point. I can modify it in Cinder easy enough and won't complain (too much more), but I'm also wondering how many *other* things might fall in to this category. > > -- > Julien Danjou > /* Free Software hacker * independent consultant > http://julien.danjou.info */ _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev