On 11/16/2013 11:18 AM, Álvaro López García wrote: > On Fri 15 Nov 2013 (07:28), Dan Smith wrote: >> Hi all, > > Hi Dan. > >> As you know, Nova adopted a plan to require CI testing for all our >> in-tree hypervisors by the Icehouse release. At the summit last week, we >> determined the actual plan for deprecating non-compliant drivers. I put >> together a page detailing the specific requirements we're putting in >> place as well as a plan and timeline for how the deprecation process >> will proceed: >> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HypervisorSupportMatrix/DeprecationPlan >> >> I also listed the various drivers and whether we've heard any concrete >> plans from them. Driver owners should feel free to add details to that >> and correct any of the statements if incorrect. > > I've posted an email one month ago about this and the support of Xen > via libvirt [1]. We are happy users of this ad we would love to see > it being promoted form the use-at-your-own-risk group C to group B. > Should we add it to the list of drivers in the group C, and add another > column to the table so that we can start filling it with the > supported/working features? Should I fill a blueprint for this? > > [1] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-October/016661.html
I don't think we need a blueprint. Yes, I would list it under group C and add a column for it. Is there any chance you would be interested in working on setting up CI for it? -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev