> -----Original Message----- > From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] > Sent: 26 November 2013 13:56 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Cc: Sean Dague > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hypervisor CI requirement and > deprecation plan > > On 11/26/2013 04:48 AM, Bob Ball wrote: > > > > I hope we can safely say that we should run against all "gating" tests which > require Nova? Currently we run quite a number of tests in the gate that > succeed even when Nova is not running as the gate isn't just for Nova but > for all projects. > > Would you like to come up with a more detailed proposal? What tests > would you cut, and how much time does it save?
I don't have a detailed proposal yet - but it's very possible that we'll want one in the coming weeks. In terms of the time saved, I noticed that a tempest smoke run with Nova absent took 400 seconds on one of my machines (a particularly slow one) - so I imagine that would translate to maybe a 300 second / 5 minute reduction in overall time. Total smoke took approximately 800 seconds on the same machine. If the approach could be acceptable then yes, I'm happy to come up with a detailed set of tests that I would propose cutting. My primary hesitation with the approach is it would need Tempest reviewers to be aware of this extra type of test, and flag up if a test is added to the full tempest suite which should also be in the nova tempest suite. Bob _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
