On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona, > we've had some productive cross-project discussions amongst the various > deployment teams. > > It's clear that we share many common problems, such as patterns for major > version upgrades (even if the workflow isn't identical we've all duplicated > effort e.g around basic nova upgrade workflow recently), container images > and other common building blocks for configuration management. > > Here's a non-exhaustive list of sessions where we had some good > cross-project discussion, and agreed a number of common problems where > collaboration may be possible: > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ansible-config-mgt
first action: EmilienM + bnemec to write a spec in oslo.config that aims to generate a file (YAML or JSON) with all parameters. > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-kolla-kubernetes > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-pike-ptg-images > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-ocata-fuel-tripleo-integration > > If there is interest in continuing the discussions on a more regular basis, > I'd like to propose we start a cross-project working group: > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Category:Working_Groups > > If I go ahead and do this is "deployment" a sufficiently project-neutral > term to proceed with? Yes, +1 for Deployment WG. It's pretty clear that we saw more interest than before at the last PTG in Atlanta. It's time to do concrete things :-) > I'd suggest we start with an informal WG, which it seems just requires an > update to the wiki, e.g no need for any formal project team at this point? > > Likewise I know some folks have expressed an interest in an IRC channel > (openstack-deployment?), I'm happy to start with the ML but open to IRC > also if someone is willing to set up the channel. +1 for IRC channel. > Perhaps we can start by using the tag "deployment" in all cross-project ML > traffic, then potentially discuss IRC (or even regular meetings) if it > becomes apparrent these would add value beyond ML discussion? +1 too. > Please follow up here if anyone has other/better ideas on how to facilitate > ongoing cross-team discussion and I'll do my best to help move things > forward. Thanks for kicking it off! > Thanks! > > Steve > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Emilien Macchi __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev