On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona, >> we've had some productive cross-project discussions amongst the various >> deployment teams. >> >> It's clear that we share many common problems, such as patterns for major >> version upgrades (even if the workflow isn't identical we've all duplicated >> effort e.g around basic nova upgrade workflow recently), container images >> and other common building blocks for configuration management. >> >> Here's a non-exhaustive list of sessions where we had some good >> cross-project discussion, and agreed a number of common problems where >> collaboration may be possible: >> >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ansible-config-mgt > > first action: EmilienM + bnemec to write a spec in oslo.config that > aims to generate a file (YAML or JSON) with all parameters.
done (thanks Ben): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/440835 Please review it and give any feedback. >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-kolla-kubernetes >> >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-pike-ptg-images >> >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-ocata-fuel-tripleo-integration >> >> If there is interest in continuing the discussions on a more regular basis, >> I'd like to propose we start a cross-project working group: >> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Category:Working_Groups >> >> If I go ahead and do this is "deployment" a sufficiently project-neutral >> term to proceed with? > > Yes, +1 for Deployment WG. It's pretty clear that we saw more interest > than before at the last PTG in Atlanta. It's time to do concrete > things :-) > >> I'd suggest we start with an informal WG, which it seems just requires an >> update to the wiki, e.g no need for any formal project team at this point? >> >> Likewise I know some folks have expressed an interest in an IRC channel >> (openstack-deployment?), I'm happy to start with the ML but open to IRC >> also if someone is willing to set up the channel. > > +1 for IRC channel. > >> Perhaps we can start by using the tag "deployment" in all cross-project ML >> traffic, then potentially discuss IRC (or even regular meetings) if it >> becomes apparrent these would add value beyond ML discussion? > > +1 too. > >> Please follow up here if anyone has other/better ideas on how to facilitate >> ongoing cross-team discussion and I'll do my best to help move things >> forward. > > Thanks for kicking it off! > >> Thanks! >> >> Steve >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > -- > Emilien Macchi -- Emilien Macchi __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev