On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:06:18AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > On 03/06/2017 08:43 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > On 2017-03-06 14:03, Sean Dague wrote: > >> I'm trying to understand the implications of > >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/439500. And the comment in the linked > >> email: > >> > >> ">> Yes, we decided some time ago to not translate the log files anymore > >> and > >>>> thus our tools do not handle them anymore - and in general, we remove > >>>> these kind of files." > >> > >> Does that mean that all the _LE, _LI, _LW stuff in projects should be > >> fully removed? Nova currently enforces those things are there - > >> https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/e88dd0034b1b135d680dae3494597e295add9cfe/nova/hacking/checks.py#L314-L333 > >> and want to make sure our tools aren't making us do work that the i18n > >> team is ignoring and throwing away. > >
So... just looking for a definitive statement on this since there has been some back and forth discussion. Is it correct to say - all projects may (should?) now remove all bits in place for using and enforcing the _Lx() translation markers. Only _() should be used for user visible error messages. Sean (smcginnis) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
