Hi Sean, David, Marc

I have one question about negative tests.
Now we are in moratorium on new negative tests in Tempest:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-November/018748.html

Is it OK to consider this kind of patch(separating negative tests from
positive test file, without any additional negative tests) as an exception?


Thanks
Ken'ichi Ohmichi

---

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adalberto Medeiros [mailto:adal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:33 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest] list of negative tests that need to be 
> separated from other tests.
> 
> Thanks Ken'ichi. I added my name to a couple of them in that list.
> 
> Adalberto Medeiros
> Linux Technology Center
> Openstack and Cloud Development
> IBM Brazil
> Email: adal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> 
> On Mon 02 Dec 2013 07:36:38 AM BRST, Kenichi Oomichi wrote:
> >
> > Hi Adalberto,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Adalberto Medeiros [mailto:adal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> >> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 11:29 PM
> >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [tempest] list of negative tests that need to be 
> >> separated from other tests.
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I understand that one action toward negative tests, even before
> >> implementing the automatic schema generation, is to move them to their
> >> own file (.py), thus separating them from the 'positive' tests. (See
> >> patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56807/ as an example).
> >>
> >> In order to do so, I've got a list of testcases that still have both
> >> negative and positive tests together, and listed them in the following
> >> etherpad link: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/bp_negative_tests_list
> >>
> >> The idea here is to have patches for each file until we get all the
> >> negative tests in their own files. I also linked the etherpad to the
> >> specific blueprint created by Marc for negative tests in icehouse
> >> (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/negative-tests ).
> >>
> >> Please, send any comments and whether you think this is the right
> >> approach to keep track on that task.
> >
> > We have already the same etherpad, and we are working on it.
> > Please check the following:
> > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TempestTestDevelopment
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Ken'ichi Ohmichi
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to