On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Kenichi Oomichi <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Hi Sean, David, Marc > > I have one question about negative tests. > Now we are in moratorium on new negative tests in Tempest: > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-November/018748.html > > Is it OK to consider this kind of patch(separating negative tests from > positive test file, without any additional negative tests) as an exception? > > I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I think it's ok given it will make the eventual removal of hand coded negative tests in the future easier even though it costs us a bit of churn now. Chris > > Thanks > Ken'ichi Ohmichi > > --- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adalberto Medeiros [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:33 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest] list of negative tests that need > to be separated from other tests. > > > > Thanks Ken'ichi. I added my name to a couple of them in that list. > > > > Adalberto Medeiros > > Linux Technology Center > > Openstack and Cloud Development > > IBM Brazil > > Email: [email protected] > > > > On Mon 02 Dec 2013 07:36:38 AM BRST, Kenichi Oomichi wrote: > > > > > > Hi Adalberto, > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Adalberto Medeiros [mailto:[email protected]] > > >> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 11:29 PM > > >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > > >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [tempest] list of negative tests that need > to be separated from other tests. > > >> > > >> Hi! > > >> > > >> I understand that one action toward negative tests, even before > > >> implementing the automatic schema generation, is to move them to their > > >> own file (.py), thus separating them from the 'positive' tests. (See > > >> patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56807/ as an example). > > >> > > >> In order to do so, I've got a list of testcases that still have both > > >> negative and positive tests together, and listed them in the following > > >> etherpad link: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/bp_negative_tests_list > > >> > > >> The idea here is to have patches for each file until we get all the > > >> negative tests in their own files. I also linked the etherpad to the > > >> specific blueprint created by Marc for negative tests in icehouse > > >> (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/negative-tests ). > > >> > > >> Please, send any comments and whether you think this is the right > > >> approach to keep track on that task. > > > > > > We have already the same etherpad, and we are working on it. > > > Please check the following: > > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TempestTestDevelopment > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > Ken'ichi Ohmichi > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
