On 28/04/17 10:50 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28 2017, gordon chung wrote:
>> if the sack is unlocked, then it means a processing worker isn't looking
>> at the sack, and when it does lock the sack, it first has to check sack
>> for existing measures to process and then check indexer to validate that
>> they are still active. because it checks indexer later, even if both
>> janitor and processing worker check lock at same time, we can guarantee
>> it will have indexer state processing worker sees is > 00:00:00 since
>> janitor has state before getting lock, while processing worker as state
>> sometime after getting lock.
> My brain hurts but that sounds perfect. That even means we potentially
> did not have to lock currently, sack or no sack.

yeah, i think you're right.

success! confused you with my jumble of random words.


OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Reply via email to