On 19 May 2017 at 12:24, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > I do get the concerns of extra logic in Nova, but the decision to break > up the working compute with network and storage problem space across 3 > services and APIs doesn't mean we shouldn't still make it easy to > express some pretty basic and common intents.
Given that we've similar needs for retries and race avoidance in and between glance, nova, cinder and neutron, and a need or orchestrate between at least these three (arguably other infrastructure projects too, I'm not trying to get into specifics), maybe the answer is to put that logic in a new service, that talks to those four, and provides a nice simple API, while allowing the cinder, nova etc APIs to remove things like internal retries? -- Duncan Thomas __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
