> Just a couple things (I don't think it changes the decision made). > > Cryptography does at least claim to support PyPy (see > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cryptography/ trove identifiers), so > possibly a bug on their end that should get filed? > > Also, our user clients should probably run under as many interpreters as > possible to make life easier for end users; however, they currently > depend on oslo and if oslo doesn't support pypy then likely not > reasonable to do in user clients. > > Clark >
This looks like it may be due to the version of pypy packaged for Xenial. The pypi info for cryptography does state PyPy 5.3+ is supported. The latest package I see for 16.04 is pypy/xenial-updates 5.1.2+dfsg-1~16.04. Is there a way we can get a newer version loaded on our images? I would be fine testing against it, though the lack of oslo support does give a high risk that something else may break once we get past the cryptography issue. Sean __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
