On 06/15/2017 10:35 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2017-06-15 10:48:21 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
I think that, despite the efforts of the Fuel team, Fuel did not become
what we hoped when we made it official: a universal installer that would
be used across the board. It was worth a try, I'm happy that we tried,
but I think it's time to stop considering it a part of "OpenStack"
proper and make it a hosted project. It can of course continue its
existence as an unofficial project hosted on OpenStack infrastructure.

Thoughts ?

I agree, it makes sense to be more clear as to the lack of
community-wide support for that effort. Perhaps if its popularity
increases outside one vendor's customer base to the point where
contributions from a broader set of stakeholders emerge, we can once
again evaluate its governance state.

While I personally agree that Fuel should be moved out of the official projects list, I'd like to point out that Triple-O is virtually entirely a Red Hat project:


so the fact that a project is entirely run by a single vendor or "has popularity outside one vendor's customer base" has not been and continues not to be a deciding factor on whether something is an official OpenStack project or not.

I'd fully support the removal of all deployment projects from the "official OpenStack projects list".


OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Reply via email to