I strongly believe Openstack must have any one official project for deployment whether its Fuel or anything else. Cutting it short, talking to number of people across industry/academic/government institutions, got a sense that its necessary that there should be a official tool more than Devstack for deployment.
Regards, Vikash On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Dean Troyer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Jay Pipes <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd fully support the removal of all deployment projects from the > "official > > OpenStack projects list". > > Nice to hear Jay! :) > > It was intentional from the beginning to not be in the deployment > space, we allowed those projects in (not unanimously IIRC) and most of > them did not evolve as expected. > > I would not mind picking one winner and spending effort making an > extremely easy, smooth, upgradable install that is The OneTrue > OpenStack, I do not expect us to ever agree what that will look like > so it is effectively never going to happen. We've seen how far > single-vendor projects have gone, and none of them reached that level. > > dt > > -- > > Dean Troyer > [email protected] > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
