On 15/06/17 11:28 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > The purpose (my 2 cents) is to highlight what projects are under > governance and those that are not.
going down the rabbit hole, what does it mean to be under governance? projects that want to use the openstack brand and were, at the time of acceptance, supported some subset[1] of: 'open', had some testing, supported keystone, had a human resource? i don't really see how this differs from big tent? seems more like the same but without the 'big-tent' stigma? are we hoping openstack foundation to be a cloud-specific apache foundation? maybe it already is, and if so, i don't really understand the additional labeling we're trying to achieve. [1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/new-projects-requirements.html -- gord __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
