On 13/06/17 09:50 -0500, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 13/06/17 10:49 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:Quick attempt at a summary of the discussion so far, with my questions:* Short-term, Glance needs help to stay afloat - Sean volunteered to help - but glance needs to add core reviewers to get stuff flowing -> could the VM/BM workgroup also help ? Any progress there ?+1 Given the current situation, I think we'll get any help we can. I'd be happy to add Sean and a couple of other volunteers to the core team until the end of the cycle. When Pike is out, we can do a status check and see how to proceed.
I've proposed a patch to add Glance to the list of top-5 help wanted[0]. Please, review and let me know what y'all think. In addition to this, I'd like to for the Glance team to seriously consider the possibility of having a provisional, extra, core team to go through the Pike cycle. I'm ok with adding people to the general core team and describe in an email thread who these folks are, for how long we think we'll need this, etc. Who else would like to volunteer to help? The help needed is not so much on fixing bugs but rather reviewing the patches that fix bugs and help moving the release forward. I hope the community will grow soonish so that we can go back to the regular core team. Flavio [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474604/ -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
