On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 05:15:59PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:33:02PM +0800, jiaopengju wrote: > > Hi Dims, > > I got response from core member of ec2-api. What do you think about it? > > > > > > ---------------------------------- > > Hi, > > > > > > I don't treat adding new library as a problem. > > > > > > - I see that you don't remove boto - so your change doesn't affect ec2-api > > code. > > Part of the role of the requirements team is to ensure that we don't end > up with several libraries that have significant overlap in > functionality. Clearly boto and boto3 fall squarely in that camp. > > What the requirements team needs is some assurance that switching to > boto3 is something that the ec2-api team would be able to do. Running > on boto which has been deprecated in favor of boto3 make sense from a > lot of levels. We're far enough into the Queens cycle that I doubt it'd > happen this cycle :(
s/Queens/Pike/ I'm getting my cycles mixed up that's not a good sign. Yours Tony.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
