Flavio Percoco wrote:
> Sometimes I wonder if we still need to maintain a Wiki. I guess some
> projects still use it but I wonder if the use they make of the Wiki could be 
> moved
> somewhere else.
> 
> For example, in the TC we use it for the Agenda but I think that could be 
> moved
> to an etherpad. Things that should last forever should be documented somewhere
> (project repos, governance repo in the TC case) where we can actually monitor
> what goes in and easily clean up.

This is a complete tangent, but I'll bite :) We had a thorough
discussion about that last year, summarized at:

http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-June/096481.html

TL,DR; was that while most authoritative content should (and has been
mostly) moved off the wiki, it's still useful as a cheap publication
platform for teams and workgroups, somewhere between a git repository
with a docs job and an etherpad.

FWIW the job of migrating authoritative things off the wiki is still
on-going. As an example, Thingee is spearheading the effort to move the
"How to Contribute" page and other first pointers to a reference website
(see recent thread about that).

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to