Erno Kuvaja wrote: > [...] > So this raises a question: If it is integral part of Glare becoming > part of big tent, does it mean that we as OpenStack Community > fundamentally agree on that goal? because in that case I would be way > less supportive. [...] Approving Glare as an official OpenStack project wouldn't bless it as Glance NG, it would just be recognizing that Glare is being developed by members of the OpenStack community, following our open development principles, and that the scope of the project is helping with the OpenStack mission.
I think we are mostly comfortable with the first part (the principles match). We are slightly less comfortable with the second part (the scope match). If we determined that Glare is actively hurting OpenStack mission (by adding confusion or gratuitously duplicating effort or introducing interoperability issues) we would likely have to reject it. Mike's answers are reassuring, so I'm looking forward to continuing this discussion on this list and at the Denver PTG, and finally make the call at the start of the Queens cycle. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev