On 17-08-02 23:18:19, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:39:07AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > We have a few projects that have modified stable branch release > > notes by editing the files on master, which makes those notes appear > > as part of the current release. Reno has a new option to address > > that problem by ignoring some note files, and I would like to release > > that version to allow project teams to fix up their release notes > > for pike. I really thought I had already released that update, so > > I'm sorry for the late request. > > > > Reno is only used during release notes builds, but it does appear > > in the global requirements list and constraints list. I think the > > risk is minimal. > > > > https://review.openstack.org/489998 > > Package : reno [reno!=2.3.1,>=1.8.0] (used by 220 projects) > Also affects : 220 projects > <snip> > > So yeah it *could* destabalise the gate for a day if there is an issue. > I'm not saying that's likely but it has happened in the past. > > Looking at the reno change log I don't see anything that worries me. > > From a requirements POV I'm +2 on a u-c bump -2 on a g-r bump. > > Yours Tony.
Agreed, the amount of projects that'd be impacted by a GR bump is too high, but a UC bump is fine. -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev