> For me, a tutorial is something that teaches. So after I've gone through a
> tutorial I would expect to have learned how installs work and would just
know
> these things (with an occasional need to reference a few points) going
forward.
>
> A guide to me is something that I know I will use whenever I need to do
> something. So for me, having an installation guide is what I would expect
> from this as every time I need to do a package based install, I am going
to pull
> up the guide to go through it.
>
Interesting.
So Sean has the opposite impression from Eric and I. Yeah, that does
make it seem like reaching a consensus will be difficult.
At that point I think consistency becomes the most important thing.
I completely agree consistency is more important, than bike shedding over the
name :)
To be honest, it would be easier to change everything to ‘guide’ – seeing as
all our URLs are ‘install-guide’.
But that’s the lazy in me speaking.
Industry wise – there does seem to be more of a trend towards ‘guide’ rather
than ‘tutorial’. Although, that is at a cursory glance.
I am happy to investigate further, if this matter is of some contention to
people?
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
