On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:51 PM, John Dickinson <m...@not.mn> wrote: > What I heard from ops in the room is that they want (to start) one release a > year who's branch isn't deleted after a year. What if that's exactly what we > did? I propose that OpenStack only do one release a year instead of two. We > still keep N-2 stable releases around. We still do backports to all open > stable branches. We still do all the things we're doing now, we just do it > once a year instead of twice. >
This seems like a much more reasonable proposal with less of a musical chairs feeling. The spun up software developer in my basement nods in violent agreement with the idea, and the tortured QA engineer I keep locked up out back would love nothing more than some extra time to test. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev