Hi Jay, Okay. Thanks for the clarification. Makes sense.
Random-thinking: Maybe the best would be to have a privilege level what covers the needs of MANO/NFVO, but still not full admin privileges. Do you think is this possible? Br, Gerg0 -----Original Message----- From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 4:41 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][gap-04][blazar]: Clarification on the scope of the capacity query On 12/11/2017 07:24 AM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) wrote: > Hi Masahito, > > Thanks for the answer. > Some clarification questions. You mention that the NFVO works as both an user > and an admin for the cloud. Is this becouse the resource usage per user info > is more for cloud operators while the resource usage per tenant / per > resource provider is more for cloud users? > > The solution you described is valid for the capacity per tenant case if I > understand right. Is this correct? I think he is more referring to the fact that the MANO/NFVO service user must have administrative privileges in order to, for example, spawn new instances in multiple projects/tenants and communicate with the control plane to do things like adjust quotas, etc. Best, -jay __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
