On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Colleen Murphy <coll...@gazlene.net> wrote:
> At the last PTG we had some time on Monday and Tuesday for > cross-project discussions related to baremetal and VM management. We > don't currently have that on the schedule for this PTG. There is still > some free time available that we can ask for[1]. Should we try to > schedule some time for this? > I'd attend for the topics you list below, FWIW. > > From a keystone perspective, some things we'd like to talk about with > the BM/VM teams are: > > - Unified limits[2]: we now have a basic REST API for registering > limits in keystone. Next steps are building out libraries that can > consume this API and calculate quota usage and limit allocation, and > developing models for quotas in project hierarchies. Input from other > projects is essential here. > - RBAC: we've introduced "system scope"[3] to fix the admin-ness > problem, and we'd like to guide other projects through the migration. > - Application credentials[4]: this main part of this work is largely > done, next steps are implementing better access control for it, which > is largely just a keystone team problem but we could also use this > time for feedback on the implementation so far > > There's likely some non-keystone-related things that might be at home > in a dedicated BM/VM room too. Do we want to have a dedicated day or > two for these projects? Or perhaps not dedicated days, but > planned-in-advance meeting time? Or should we wait and schedule it > ad-hoc if we feel like we need it? > There's always plenty to discuss between nova and ironic, but we usually just schedule those topics somewhat ad-hoc. Never opposed to some dedicated time if folks will show up, though. :) // jim
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev