On 2018-01-31 10:44:12 -0600 (-0600), Matthew Thode wrote: [...] > Thanks for the link, and yes should probably just be discussed in a > review. Missing a setup.py/cfg and license and testing all make it seem > like a no-go though.
The 0.0.2 sdist on PyPI does contain those, leading me to suspect that either the GH repo is non-canonical or its Python packaging files are maintained independent of revision control. -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
