The keystone team is parsing the unified limits discussions from last week. One of the things we went over as a group was the usability of the current API .
Currently, the create and update APIs support batch processing. So specifying a list of limits is valid for both. This was a part of the original proposal as a way to make it easier for operators to set all their registered limits with a single API call. The API also has unique IDs for each limit reference. The consensus was that this felt a bit weird with a resource that contains a unique set of attributes that can make up a constraints (service, resource type, and optionally a region). We're discussing ways to make this API more consistent with how the rest of keystone works while maintaining usability for operators. Does anyone see issues with supporting batch creation for limits and individual updates? In other words, removing the ability to update a set of limits in a single API call, but keeping the ability to create them in batches? We were talking about this in the keystone channel, but opening this up on the ML to get more feedback from other people who were present in those discussions last week.  https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/identity/v3/index.html#unified-limits  http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-keystone/%23openstack-keystone.2018-03-07.log.html#t2018-03-07T22:49:46
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev