On 4/25/2018 4:07 PM, Jimmy McArthur wrote:
Please have a look at the Vancouver Forum schedule: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15hkU0FLJ7yqougCiCQgprwTy867CGnmUvAvKaBjlDAo/edit?usp=sharing (also attached as a CSV) The proposed schedule was put together by two members from UC, TC and Foundation.

We do our best to avoid moving scheduled items around as it tends to create a domino affect, but we do realize we might have missed something.  The schedule should generally be set, but if you see a major conflict in either content or speaker availability, please email speakersupp...@openstack.org.

Two questions:

1. What does the yellow on the pre-emptible instances cell mean?

2. Just from looking at this, it looks like there were far fewer submissions for forum topics than actual slots available, so basically everything was approved (unless it was an obvious duplicate or not appropriate for a forum session), is that right?

In the past when I've wondered if topic x should be a forum session or if I shouldn't bother, I was told to load up the proposals because chances were there would be more slots than proposals, and that seems to still be true.

On the one hand, less content to choose from is refreshing so you don't have to worry about picking between as many sessions that you're interested in. But I also wonder how many people held back on proposing something for fear of rejection or that they'd be taking a slot for something with a higher priority. I'm not sure if there is a problem here, or a solution needed, or if it would be useful for the people that pick the sessions to give a heads up before the deadline that there are still a lot of slots open.

--

Thanks,

Matt

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to