Hi,
On 05/15/2018 09:19 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote:
Hello!
As part of the work from the Security Squad, we added the ability for the
containerized undercloud to encrypt the overcloud plans. This is done by
enabling Swift's encrypted volumes, which require barbican. Right now it's
turned off, but I would like to enable it by default [1]. What do you folks think?
I like the idea, but I'm a bit skeptical about adding a new service to already
quite bloated undercloud. Why is barbican a hard requirement here?
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/567200/
BR
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com <mailto:jaosor...@gmail.com>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
