Also I am concerned that the repo just seems to have mega-commits like:
https://github.com/starlingx-staging/stx-glance/commit/1ec64167057e3368f27a1a81aca294b771e79c5e
https://github.com/starlingx-staging/stx-nova/commit/71acfeae0d1c59fdc77704527d763bd85a276f9a
(not so mega)
https://github.com/starlingx-staging/stx-glance/commit/1ec64167057e3368f27a1a81aca294b771e79c5e
I am very confused now as well; it feels a lot like a code dump (which I
get and it's nice to see companies patches, but it seems odd that this
would ever be put anywhere official and expect?/hope? people to dissect
and extract code that starlingx obviously couldn't put the manpower
behind to do the same).
Brian Haley wrote:
On 05/22/2018 04:57 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Warning: strong opinions ahead.
On 05/22/2018 02:54 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
Developers will need to re-create a repo locally in
order to work or test the code and create reviews (there are more git
challenges here). It would be challenging to do functional testing on
the rest of STX in CI without access to all of the code.
Please don't take this the wrong way, Dean, but you aren't seriously
suggesting that anyone outside of Windriver/Intel would ever
contribute to these repos are you?
What motivation would anyone outside of Windriver/Intel -- who must
make money on this effort otherwise I have no idea why they are doing
it -- have to commit any code at all to StarlingX?
I read this the other way - the goal is to get all the forked code from
StarlingX into upstream repos. That seems backwards from how this should
have been done (i.e. upstream first), and I don't see how a project
would prioritize that over other work.
I'm truly wondering why was this even open-sourced to begin with? I'm
as big a supporter of open source as anyone, but I'm really struggling
to comprehend the business, technical, or marketing decisions behind
this action. Please help me understand. What am I missing?
I'm just as confused.
-Brian
My personal opinion is that I don't think that any products,
derivatives or distributions should be hosted on openstack.org
infrastructure.
Are any of the distributions of OpenStack listed at
https://www.openstack.org/marketplace/distros/ hosted on openstack.org
infrastructure? No. And I think that is completely appropriate.
Best,
-jay
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
