On 18-07-26 10:43:05, melanie witt wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'd like to ask for an exception to add os-vif 1.11.1 to stable/rocky. The
> current release for rocky, 1.11.0, added a new feature: the NoOp Plugin, but
> it's not actually usable (it's not being loaded) because we missed adding a
> file to the setup.cfg.
> 
> We have fixed the problem in a one liner add to setup.cfg [1] and we would
> like to be able to do another release 1.11.1 for rocky to include this fix.
> That way, the NoOp Plugin feature advertised in the release notes [2] for
> rocky would be usable for consumers.
> 
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/585530
> [2] 
> https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/os-vif/unreleased.html#relnotes-1-11-0
> 

Yep, we talked about it in the release channel.

+----------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+------+------------------------------------+
| Repository                             | Filename                             
                              | Line | Text                               |
+----------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+------+------------------------------------+
| kuryr-kubernetes                       | requirements.txt                     
                              |   18 | os-vif!=1.8.0,>=1.7.0 # Apache-2.0 |
| nova                                   | requirements.txt                     
                              |   59 | os-vif!=1.8.0,>=1.7.0 # Apache-2.0 |
| nova-lxd                               | requirements.txt                     
                              |    7 | os-vif!=1.8.0,>=1.9.0 # Apache-2.0 |
| networking-bigswitch                   | requirements.txt                     
                              |    6 | os-vif>=1.1.0 # Apache-2.0         |
| networking-bigswitch                   | test-requirements.txt                
                              |   25 | os-vif>=1.1.0 # Apache-2.0         |
| networking-midonet                     | test-requirements.txt                
                              |   40 | os-vif!=1.8.0,>=1.7.0 # Apache-2.0 |
+----------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+------+------------------------------------+

All these projects would need re-releases if you plan on raising the
minimum.  They would also need reviews submitted individually for that.
A upper-constraint only fix would not need that, but would also still
allow consumers to encounter the bug, up to you to decide.
LGTM otherwise.

-- 
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to