On 01/13/2014 05:05 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
Honestly, I've not done enough large scale js projects to know whether
we'd consider status.js to be big or not. I just know it's definitely
getting too big for += all the html together and doing document.writes.
Yes indeed.
I guess the real question I had is is there an incremental path
towards any of the other frameworks? I can see how to incrementally
bring in templates, but again my personal lack of experience on these
others means I don't know.
Short answer: Yes, and the incremental path will be more/less difficult
depending on which application framework you want to move to. [/captain
obvious]
Long answer: Pretty much all the template frameworks out there use
{{mustache-style}} syntax. Some application frameworks use handlebars
directly (ember), for some it's pluggable (knockout), others have their
own framework with similar markup (angular). From what I saw of
status.js, it's really not complicated enough to preclude a refactor to
any of the above.
Michael
Also, what Monty said.
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
