On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 14:34 +0100, Thomas Herve wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been looking at Neutron default LBaaS provider using haproxy, and while > it's working nicely, it seems to have several shortcomings in terms of > scalability and high availability. The Libra project seems to offer a more > robust alternative, at least for scaling. The haproxy implementation in > Neutron seems to continue to evolve (like with > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/lbaas-ha-haproxy), but I'm > wondering why we can't leverage Libra. The APIs are a bit different, but the > goals look very similar, and there is a waste of effort with 2 different > implementations. Maybe we could see a Libra driver for Neutron LBaaS for > example?
Yep, it's a completely duplicative and wasteful effort. It would be great for Libra developers to contribute to Neutron LBaaS. Best, -jay _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
