>what about having swift:// which defaults to the configured tenant and
auth url for what we now call swift-internal, and we allow for user input
to change tenant and auth url for what would be swift-external?

I like the proposal.

Andrew.


On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Matthew Farrellee <[email protected]> wrote:

> andrew,
>
> what about having swift:// which defaults to the configured tenant and
> auth url for what we now call swift-internal, and we allow for user input
> to change tenant and auth url for what would be swift-external?
>
> in fact, we may need to add the tenant selection in icehouse. it's a
> pretty big limitation to only allow a single tenant.
>
> best,
>
>
> matt
>
> On 01/23/2014 11:15 PM, Andrew Lazarev wrote:
>
>> Matt,
>>
>> For swift-internal we are using the same keystone (and identity protocol
>> version) as for savanna. Also savanna admin tenant is used.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrew.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Matthew Farrellee <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     what makes it internal vs external?
>>
>>     swift-internal needs user & pass
>>
>>     swift-external needs user & pass & ?auth url?
>>
>>     best,
>>
>>
>>     matt
>>
>>     On 01/23/2014 08:43 PM, Andrew Lazarev wrote:
>>
>>         Matt,
>>
>>         I can easily imagine situation when job binaries are stored in
>>         external
>>         HDFS or external SWIFT (like data sources). Internal and
>>         external swifts
>>         are different since we need additional credentials.
>>
>>         Thanks,
>>         Andrew.
>>
>>
>>         On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Matthew Farrellee
>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>>
>>              trevor,
>>
>>              job binaries are stored in swift or an internal savanna db,
>>              represented by swift-internal:// and savanna-db://
>>         respectively.
>>
>>              why swift-internal:// and not just swift://?
>>
>>              fyi, i see mention of a potential future version of savanna
>> w/
>>              swift-external://
>>
>>              best,
>>
>>
>>              matt
>>
>>              ___________________________________________________
>>              OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>              [email protected].____org
>>              <mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.__openstack.org
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>         http://lists.openstack.org/____cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/____
>> openstack-dev
>>         <http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__
>> openstack-dev>
>>         <http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__
>> openstack-dev
>>         <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
>> openstack-dev>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         _________________________________________________
>>         OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>         [email protected].__org
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__
>> openstack-dev
>>         <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
>> openstack-dev>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _________________________________________________
>>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>     [email protected].__org
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack-dev<
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to