On 02/24/2014 06:13 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 02/24/2014 04:59 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> So, that begs a new approach. Because I think at this point even if we >> did put out Nova v3, there can never be a v4. It's too much, too big, >> and doesn't fit in the incremental nature of the project. > > Does it necessarily need to be that way though? Maybe we bump the > version number every time we make a non-backwards-compatible change, > even if it's just removing an API call that has been deprecated for a > while.
So I'm not sure how this is different than the keep v2 and use
microversioning suggestion that is already in this thread.
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
[email protected] / [email protected]
http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
