On 02/24/2014 06:31 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 17:59 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: >> So we do really need to be pragmatic here as well. Because our >> experience with v3 so far has been doing a major version bump on Nova is >> a minimum of 2 years, and that doesn't reach a completion point that >> anyone's happy with to switch over. > > I don't see why version 4 need repeat the timeline of v3 development. > I'm not saying it isn't possible, just that one doesn't necessarily lead > to the other. > > Best, > -jay
I guess having watched this evolve, it's not clear to me how to do it in
a shorter time frame. Maybe we just made tons of mistakes in the
process, but it seems like anything large like this is really 3 - 4
cycles. That was the cells timeline, that's been the baremetal story
timeline. Even the scheduler forklift, that everyone thought could
happen in a single cycle, is probably going to be 3 cycles start to finish.
Ways in which we could do this quicker would be appreciated. Though I do
like getting a few hours of sleep a night.
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
s...@dague.net / sean.da...@samsung.com
http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
