Whoops! In case anyone was wondering, I wasn't telling myself that I had a good idea :-P. I just clicked reply to the wrong email. The correct email to which this was a reply is below.
> Good idea -- here's the blueprint: > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/update-to-latest-websockify ----- Original Message ----- From: "Abhishek Kekane" <[email protected]> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 1:00:59 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] New Websockify Release Hi, Are you going to file new blueprint or log a bug in Launchpad to encounter this change. Thanks, Abhishek -----Original Message----- From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 4:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] New Websockify Release On 02/27/2014 11:22 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Solly Ross wrote: >> We (the websockify/noVNC team) have released a new version of websockify >> (0.6.0). It contains several fixes and features relating to OpenStack (a >> couple of bugs were fixed, and native support for the `logging` module was >> added). Unfortunately, to integrate it into OpenStack, a patch is needed to >> the websocketproxy code in Nova >> (https://gist.github.com/DirectXMan12/9233369) due to a refactoring of the >> websockify API. My concern is that the various distos most likely have not >> had time to update the package in their package repositories. What is the >> appropriate timescale for updating Nova to work with the new version? > > Thanks for reaching out ! > > I'll let the Nova devs speak, but in that specific case it might make > sense to patch the Nova code to support both API versions. That would > facilitate the migration to 0.6.0-style code. > > At some point in the future (when 0.6.0 is everywhere) we could bump > the dep to >=0.6.0 and remove the compatibility code. > Yes - fully agreed with Thierry. I will try to put up a patch for this, but if someone gets there before me - even better :). Thanks, ndipanov _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ______________________________________________________________________ Disclaimer:This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged, confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying or forwarding _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
