On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 12:11 -0800, Dan Smith wrote: > Now, the actual concern is not related to any of that, but about whether > we're going to open this up as a new thing we support. In general, my > reaction to adding new APIs people expect to be stable is "no". However, > I understand why things like the resource reporting and even my events > mechanism are very useful for deployers to do some plumbing and > monitoring of their environment -- things that don't belong upstream anyway. > > So I'm conflicted. I think that for these two cases, as long as we can > say that it's not a stable interface, I think it's probably okay. > However, things like we've had in the past, where we provide a clear > plug point for something like "Compute manager API class" are clearly > off the table, IMHO.
How about using 'unstable' as a component of the entrypoint group? E.g., "nova.unstable.events"… -- Kevin L. Mitchell <kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com> Rackspace _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev