On 3/11/2014 3:11 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 14:18 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 3/10/2014 11:20 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote:
On 03/07/2014 11:16 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 03/07/2014 04:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:20:21AM -0800, Andrew Woodward wrote:
I'd Like to request A FFE for the remaining patches in the Ephemeral
RBD image support chain
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59148/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59149/
are still open after their dependency
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33409/ was merged.
These should be low risk as:
1. We have been testing with this code in place.
2. It's nearly all contained within the RBD driver.
This is needed as it implements an essential functionality that has
been missing in the RBD driver and this will become the second release
it's been attempted to be merged into.
Add me as a sponsor.
OK, great. That's two.
We have a hard deadline of Tuesday to get these FFEs merged (regardless
of gate status).
As alt release manager, FFE approved based on Russell's approval.
The merge deadline for Tuesday is the release meeting, not end of day.
If it's not merged by the release meeting, it's dead, no exceptions.
Both commits were merged, thanks a lot to everyone who helped land
this in Icehouse! Especially to Russel and Sean for approving the FFE,
and to Daniel, Michael, and Vish for reviewing the patches!
There was a bug reported today [1] that looks like a regression in this
new code, so we need people involved in this looking at it as soon as
possible because we have a proposed revert in case we need to yank it
out [2].
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1291014
[2]
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bug/1291014,n,z
Note that I have identified the source of the problem and am pushing a
patch shortly with unit tests.
Best,
-jay
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
My concern is how much else where assumes nova is working with the
glance v2 API because there was a nova blueprint [1] to make nova work
with the glance V2 API but that never landed in Icehouse, so I'm worried
about wack-a-mole type problems here, especially since there is no
tempest coverage for testing multiple image location support via nova.
[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/use-glance-v2-api
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
