On 03/19/2014 01:47 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > On 03/19/2014 08:20 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> As I understand it, all of the integrated projects have looked at Pecan, >> and are anticipating the transition. Most have no reason to create a new >> API version, and therefore build a new API service to avoid introducing >> incompatibilities by rebuilding the existing API with a new tool. This >> aligns with the plan when Pecan was proposed as a standard. >> >> Doug > > I have evaluated it for Cinder and have spoke to numerous interested > folks in Cinder about using Pecan. It's currently what we're planning to > move to after I did a rough prototype for some of our core API > controllers. As you mentioned, we have no reason to do a version bump > yet. We'll likely do a bump to be py3 compatible rather than for a > significant change. >
FWIW, we've also discussed it for Nova. We approved converting to use it for the v3 API that is still being worked on. I hope to see that get movement again during Juno. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev