On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:00 AM, James Polley <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 20 Mar 2014, at 5:44 am, Clint Byrum <[email protected]> wrote: > > Excerpts from Sullivan, Jon Paul's message of 2014-03-19 09:26:44 -0700: > > From: James Slagle [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> > ] > > Sent: 18 March 2014 19:58 > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Alternating meeting time for more TZ > > friendliness > > > Our current meeting time is Tuesdays at 19:00 UTC. I think this works > > ok for most folks in and around North America. > > > It was proposed during today's meeting to see if there is interest is an > > alternating meeting time every other week so that we can be a bit more > > friendly to those folks that currently can't attend. > > If that interests you, speak up :). > > > Speaking up! :D > > > > For reference, the current meeting schedules are at: > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings > > > Tuesdays at 14:00 UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt is available. > > > > If we were to have one at that time, we'd need to move the other time as > well. One driver for moving it is that our participants on the Eastern > side of Australia are already joining at 0600 their time, and will be > joining at 0500 soon. > > If I've done my TZ math right, Tuesdays at 1400 UTC would be Wednesdays > at 0100 for Sydney. > > > 0100 now, 0000 in a few weeks when DST flips here. I'd prefer 0500 to 0000 > > My first priority is making sure that theacimum > Ah. So that's what happened to the email I was composing on my iPhone - it got sent! Next time I'll ask my pocket to delete it rather than send it. As I was trying to say, I think our priority should be maximizing the number of people who can attend, not maximizing for me attending. I worry that having alternating meetings will lead to having non-overlapping sets of people in the meetings, but even if that happens I'm not sure if it's worse than only having a subset of people in the meeting. I'd be happy to stick with 1900UTC if it means more people can regularly make the meeting, even if it means I can't make it all the time. Switching to alternating 1900 Tuesday and 2100 Wednesday would mean I could make more meetings, but I don't know how it would affect other people. Speaking for myself, I find the current time is slightly painful, but > doable. 0500 will be more painful. > > If I'm reading the iCal feed linked from > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings correctly, it looks like there's > a PCI passthrough meeting scheduled at that time in -alt. Is that correct? > Is the iCal feed canonical? I don't see the meeting listed on the page, but > maybe that's also because of the tiny little screen I'm using right now. > > If I'm doing the timezone math right, it looks like the iCal feed says > that 2100UTC Wednesday is free every second week. Once all the DST flips > happen, that'll be 2100 London, 1500 SF, 0700 Sydney. > Bad time math - I was in the middle of updating this when my phone decided to send the mail. 2100UTC will be 2200 London, 1400 SF, 0700 Sydney. > > If we ran at that time on alternate weeks I'd have one I could make easily > and one I could probably make at a stretch. > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
