Stephen, Agree with you. Basically the page starts looking as requirements page. I think we need to move to google spreadsheet, where table is organized easily. Here's the doc that may do a better job for us: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ar1FuMFYRhgadDVXZ25NM2NfbGtLTkR0TDFNUWJQUWc&usp=sharing
Thanks, Eugene. On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Prashanth Hari <[email protected]> wrote: > More additions to the use cases ( > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/Usecases). > I have updated some of the features we are interested in. > > > > Thanks, > Prashanth > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Stephen Balukoff <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi y'all-- >> >> Looking at the data in the page already, it looks more like a feature >> wishlist than actual usage data. I thought we agreed to provide data based >> on percentage usage of a given feature, the end result of the data >> collection being that it would become more obvious which features are the >> most relevant to the most users, and therefore are more worthwhile targets >> for software development. >> >> Specifically, I was expecting to see something like the following (using >> hypothetical numbers of course, and where technical people from "Company A" >> & etc. fill out the data for their organization): >> >> == L7 features == >> >> "Company A" (Cloud operator serving external customers): 56% of >> load-balancer instances use >> "Company B" (Cloud operator serving external customers): 92% of >> load-balancer instances use >> "Company C" (Fortune 100 company serving internal customers): 0% of >> load-balancer instances use >> >> == SSL termination == >> >> "Company A" (Cloud operator serving external customers): 95% of >> load-balancer instances use >> "Company B" (Cloud operator serving external customers): 20% of >> load-balancer instances use >> "Company C" (Fortune 100 company serving internal customers): 50% of >> load-balancer instances use. >> >> == Racing stripes == >> >> "Company A" (Cloud operator serving external customers): 100% of >> load-balancer instances use >> "Company B" (Cloud operator serving external customers): 100% of >> load-balancer instances use >> "Company C" (Fortune 100 company serving internal customers): 100% of >> load-balancer instances use >> >> >> In my mind, a wish-list of features is only going to be relevant to this >> discussion if (after we agree on what the items under consideration ought >> to be) each technical representative presents a prioritized list for their >> organization. :/ A wish-list is great for brain-storming what ought to be >> added, but is less relevant for prioritization. >> >> In light of last week's meeting, it seems useful to list the features >> most recently discussed in that meeting and on the mailing list as being >> points on which we want to gather actual usage data (ie. from what people >> are actually using on the load balancers in their organization right now). >> Should we start a new page that lists actual usage percentages, or just >> re-vamp the one above? (After all, wish-list can be useful for discovering >> things we're missing, especially if we get people new to the discussion to >> add their $0.02.) >> >> Thanks, >> Stephen >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Jorge Miramontes < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Eugene, >>> >>> I added our data onto the requirements page since I was hoping to >>> prioritize requirements based on the operator data that gets provided. We >>> can move it over to the other page if you think that makes sense. See >>> everyone on the weekly meeting tomorrow! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> --Jorge >>> >>> From: Susanne Balle <[email protected]> >>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage >>> questions)" <[email protected]> >>> Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 4:09 PM >>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < >>> [email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Load balancing use cases. >>> Data from Operators needed. >>> >>> I added two more. I am still working on our HA use cases. Susanne >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Fox, Kevin M <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I added our priorities. I hope its formatted well enough. I just took >>>> a stab in the dark. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Kevin >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From:* Eugene Nikanorov [[email protected]] >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 01, 2014 3:02 AM >>>> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List >>>> *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Load balancing use cases. >>>> Data from Operators needed. >>>> >>>> Hi folks, >>>> >>>> On the last meeting we decided to collect usage data so we could >>>> prioritize features and see what is demanded most. >>>> >>>> Here's the blank page to do that (in a free form). I'll structure it >>>> once we have some data. >>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/Usecases >>>> >>>> Please fill with the data you have. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Eugene. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Stephen Balukoff >> Blue Box Group, LLC >> (800)613-4305 x807 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
