The document has Vendor column, it should be from Cloud
Operator?
Thanks,
Vijay V.
From: Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 11:23 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Load balancing use cases. Data
from Operators needed.
Stephen,
Agree with you. Basically the page starts looking as requirements page.
I think we need to move to google spreadsheet, where table is organized easily.
Here's the doc that may do a better job for us:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ar1FuMFYRhgadDVXZ25NM2NfbGtLTkR0TDFNUWJQUWc&usp=sharing
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Prashanth Hari
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
More additions to the use cases
(https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/Usecases).
I have updated some of the features we are interested in.
Thanks,
Prashanth
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Stephen Balukoff
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi y'all--
Looking at the data in the page already, it looks more like a feature wishlist
than actual usage data. I thought we agreed to provide data based on percentage
usage of a given feature, the end result of the data collection being that it
would become more obvious which features are the most relevant to the most
users, and therefore are more worthwhile targets for software development.
Specifically, I was expecting to see something like the following (using
hypothetical numbers of course, and where technical people from "Company A" &
etc. fill out the data for their organization):
== L7 features ==
"Company A" (Cloud operator serving external customers): 56% of load-balancer
instances use
"Company B" (Cloud operator serving external customers): 92% of load-balancer
instances use
"Company C" (Fortune 100 company serving internal customers): 0% of
load-balancer instances use
== SSL termination ==
"Company A" (Cloud operator serving external customers): 95% of load-balancer
instances use
"Company B" (Cloud operator serving external customers): 20% of load-balancer
instances use
"Company C" (Fortune 100 company serving internal customers): 50% of
load-balancer instances use.
== Racing stripes ==
"Company A" (Cloud operator serving external customers): 100% of load-balancer
instances use
"Company B" (Cloud operator serving external customers): 100% of load-balancer
instances use
"Company C" (Fortune 100 company serving internal customers): 100% of
load-balancer instances use
In my mind, a wish-list of features is only going to be relevant to this
discussion if (after we agree on what the items under consideration ought to
be) each technical representative presents a prioritized list for their
organization. :/ A wish-list is great for brain-storming what ought to be
added, but is less relevant for prioritization.
In light of last week's meeting, it seems useful to list the features most
recently discussed in that meeting and on the mailing list as being points on
which we want to gather actual usage data (ie. from what people are actually
using on the load balancers in their organization right now). Should we start a
new page that lists actual usage percentages, or just re-vamp the one above?
(After all, wish-list can be useful for discovering things we're missing,
especially if we get people new to the discussion to add their $0.02.)
Thanks,
Stephen
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Jorge Miramontes
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thanks Eugene,
I added our data onto the requirements page since I was hoping to prioritize
requirements based on the operator data that gets provided. We can move it over
to the other page if you think that makes sense. See everyone on the weekly
meeting tomorrow!
Cheers,
--Jorge
From: Susanne Balle <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 4:09 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Load balancing use cases. Data
from Operators needed.
I added two more. I am still working on our HA use cases. Susanne
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Fox, Kevin M
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I added our priorities. I hope its formatted well enough. I just took a stab in
the dark.
Thanks,
Kevin
________________________________
From: Eugene Nikanorov [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 3:02 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Load balancing use cases. Data from
Operators needed.
Hi folks,
On the last meeting we decided to collect usage data so we could prioritize
features and see what is demanded most.
Here's the blank page to do that (in a free form). I'll structure it once we
have some data.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/Usecases
Please fill with the data you have.
Thanks,
Eugene.
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807<tel:%28800%29613-4305%20x807>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
