? 2014?04?10? 15:59, Irena Berezovsky ??:
Hi Robert,
Thanks a lot the inputs you posted in the doc.
I have raised there few questions and added use case for High
Availability.
Another concern I have is regarding the assumption that there is no
case to mix different vendor cards in the setup. I think that mixing
Cisco and Intel or Mellanox cards does not make sense, but Intel and
Mellanox cards can coexist. At least for my understanding, but I may
be wrong, both Intel and Mellanox take HW VEB (HW embedded switch)
approach.
1. open to mail list.
2. admin/usr won't mixing Intel/Cisco/Mellanox card...., does not mean
we should disable it, or don't give a chance.
3. i raise couple of question and questioning the aggregate solution.
see inline comments.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zgMaXqrCnad01-jQH7Mkmf6amlghw9RMScGLBrKslmw/edit
Yongli He
Thanks,
Irena
*From:*Robert Li (baoli) [mailto:ba...@cisco.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 09, 2014 11:11 PM
*To:* Irena Berezovsky; Sandhya Dasu (sadasu); Robert Kukura; He,
Yongli (yongli...@intel.com); Itzik Brown; beag...@redhat.com
*Subject:* Re: PCI SR-IOV use cases initial doc
Hi,
I updated the doc with some of my thoughts.
Thanks,
Robert
On 3/24/14, 8:41 AM, "Irena Berezovsky" <ire...@mellanox.com
<mailto:ire...@mellanox.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I have created the initial doc to capture PCI SR-IOV networking
use cases:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zgMaXqrCnad01-jQH7Mkmf6amlghw9RMScGLBrKslmw/edit
I have updated the agenda for tomorrow meeting to discuss the use
cases.
Please comment and update
BR,
Irena
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
