于 2014年04月10日 16:28, John Garbutt 写道: > I think writing this up as a nova-spec is going to make this process > much easier: > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Nova > > It will save you having to re-write your document once you want to > submit a blueprint, and we can all see each others comments in gerrit, > and more clearly see how things change and evolve. The way the > template in nova-spec works, it should aslo help you with structuring > your argument. yeah, this worthy to do now, i begin to format my own bp to a spec. > > Please don't design assuming a single vendor solution, that is sure to agree. > get rejected (at least my me) at the blueprint review stage. You might > want a different vendor in each AZ to isolate you from failures due to > vendor bugs, if you are digging for a use case. > > I still can't see a clear description of the "tenant" use cases, I > still think thats the key to getting agreement here, and getting > useful feedback at the summit. Not sure I understand the tables, they > seem a bit confusing/distracting. yeah, maybe because it's hard to description the use case flow without bothering a reference design .
> > John > > > On 10 April 2014 09:14, yongli he <yongli...@intel.com> wrote: >> 于 2014年04月10日 15:59, Irena Berezovsky 写道: >> >> Hi Robert, >> >> Thanks a lot the inputs you posted in the doc. >> >> I have raised there few questions and added use case for High Availability. >> >> Another concern I have is regarding the assumption that there is no case to >> mix different vendor cards in the setup. I think that mixing Cisco and Intel >> or Mellanox cards does not make sense, but Intel and Mellanox cards can >> coexist. At least for my understanding, but I may be wrong, both Intel and >> Mellanox take HW VEB (HW embedded switch) approach. >> >> 1. open to mail list. >> 2. admin/usr won't mixing Intel/Cisco/Mellanox card...., does not mean we >> should disable it, or don't give a chance. >> 3. i raise couple of question and questioning the aggregate solution. see >> inline comments. >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zgMaXqrCnad01-jQH7Mkmf6amlghw9RMScGLBrKslmw/edit >> >> Yongli He >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Irena >> >> >> >> From: Robert Li (baoli) [mailto:ba...@cisco.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 11:11 PM >> To: Irena Berezovsky; Sandhya Dasu (sadasu); Robert Kukura; He, Yongli >> (yongli...@intel.com); Itzik Brown; beag...@redhat.com >> Subject: Re: PCI SR-IOV use cases initial doc >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I updated the doc with some of my thoughts. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Robert >> >> >> >> On 3/24/14, 8:41 AM, "Irena Berezovsky" <ire...@mellanox.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I have created the initial doc to capture PCI SR-IOV networking use cases: >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zgMaXqrCnad01-jQH7Mkmf6amlghw9RMScGLBrKslmw/edit >> >> >> >> I have updated the agenda for tomorrow meeting to discuss the use cases. >> >> >> >> Please comment and update >> >> >> >> BR, >> >> Irena >> >> _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev