confirmed On 04/16/2014 04:53 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Technical Committee election. > > About Me > -------------- > > I work full time on OpenStack on behalf of HP. And am part of nova-core, > nova-specs-core, hacking-core and elastic-recheck-core. Some of my more > visible accomplishments outside my involvement in nova are: > > - Creating hacking [0][1] to more efficiently use reviewers time by > automating the tedious job of checking style. > > - Starting elastic-recheck [2][3] to help us better track and triage race > conditions. > > - Helping Unwedge the gate right before the release of Havana [4]. > > - Writing several gating jobs: large-ops, neutron-large-ops and nova’s > partial-ncpu. partial-ncpu is nova’s gating test to make sure we support > doing a rolling upgrade of compute nodes (so a Havana nova-compute should > work with an Icehouse cloud). > > > > My Platform > > ------------------ > > > I think the Icehouse TC has done a wonderful job and has an impressive list > of accomplishments [4], and I would like to see the TC do more of the same > at an accelerated pace. Given the scale of OpenStack today I don’t think > sitting on the TC should be a two hour a week job. Note: I am not pushing > for more frequent meetings, but rather more ‘homework.’ Two hours a week > was fine when OpenStack had 3 integrated projects, but not so much now that > we are at 11 integrated projects. Besides just doing more of the same, here > are a few specific areas where I think the TC can be improved: > > - Make the mid-cycle incubation status reviews [6] more thorough, and > extend them to projects that are planning on filing for incubation. We > don’t want a repeat of what happened this past cycle where a project passed > its mid-cycle incubation status review [6], only to hit significant issues > in its graduation request [7]. - TC members who are not too familiar with > the project in question should do the gap analysis instead of a member of > that project. A fresh pair of eyes is always a good thing, and this will > help increase cross project feedback. > > > > Thank you for your consideration. > > > Best, > > Joe > > > > [0] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/hacking > > [1] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/hacking/ > > [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/elastic-recheck/ > > [3] http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/ > > [4] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-November/020280.html > [5] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-April/032576.html[6] > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-01-21-20.03.html[7] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/030638.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
