The allowed-address-pair extension that was added here ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38230/) allows us to add arbitrary ips to an interface to allow them. This is useful if you want to run something like VRRP between two instances.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Kevin Benton <blak...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was under the impression that the security group rules blocked addresses > not assigned by neutron[1]. > > 1. > https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/agent/linux/iptables_firewall.py#L188 > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Aaron Rosen <aaronoro...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> You can do it with ip aliasing and use one interface: >> >> ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.22/24 >> ifconfig eth0:1 10.0.0.23/24 >> ifconfig eth0:2 10.0.0.24/24 >> >> 2: eth0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN >> qlen 1000 >> link/ether 40:6c:8f:1a:a9:31 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >> inet 10.0.0.22/24 brd 10.0.0.255 scope global eth0 >> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >> inet 10.0.0.23/24 brd 10.0.0.255 scope global secondary eth0:1 >> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >> inet 10.0.0.24/24 brd 10.0.0.255 scope global secondary eth0:2 >> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Kevin Benton <blak...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Web server running multiple SSL sites that wants to be compatible with >>> clients that don't support the SNI extension. There is no way for a server >>> to get multiple IP addresses on the same interface is there? >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Aaron Rosen <aaronoro...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> This is true. Several people have asked this same question over the >>>> years though I've yet to hear a use case why one really need to do this. Do >>>> you have one? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Ronak Shah <ro...@nuagenetworks.net>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Vikash, >>>>> Currently this is not supported. the NIC not only needs to be in >>>>> different subnet, they have to be in different network as well (container >>>>> for the subnet) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Ronak >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Vikash Kumar < >>>>> vikash.ku...@oneconvergence.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> *With 'interfaces' I mean 'nics' of VM*. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Vikash Kumar < >>>>>> vikash.ku...@oneconvergence.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I want to launch one VM which will have two Ethernet interfaces >>>>>>> with IP of single subnet. Is this supported now in openstack ? Any >>>>>>> suggestion ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanx >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>>>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Kevin Benton >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > > -- > Kevin Benton > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
