On May 8, 2014, at 2:45 PM, Eugene Nikanorov
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Carlos,
Are you saying that we should only have a loadbalancer resource only in the
case where we want it to span multiple L2 networks as if it were a router? I
don't see how you arrived at that conclusion. Can you explain further.
No, I mean that loadbalancer instance is needed if we need several *different*
L2 endpoints for several front ends.
That's basically 'virtual appliance' functionality that we've discussed on
today's meeting.
From looking at the irc log it looks like nothing conclusive came out of the
meeting. I don't understand a lot of the conclusions you arrive at. For example
your rejecting the notion of a loadbalancer concrete object unless its needed
to include multi l2 network support. Will you make an honest effort to describe
your objections here in the ML cause if we can't resolve it here its going to
spill over into the summit. I certainly don't want this to dominate the summit.
Eugene.
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
