Carlos, The general objection is that if we don't need multiple VIPs (different ip, not just tcp ports) per single logical loadbalancer, then we don't need loadbalancer because everything else is addressed by VIP playing a role of loadbalancer. Regarding conclusions - I think we've heard enough negative opinions on the idea of 'container' to at least postpone this discussion to the point when we'll get some important use cases that could not be addressed by 'VIP as loadbalancer'
Eugene. On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Carlos Garza <[email protected]>wrote: > > On May 8, 2014, at 2:45 PM, Eugene Nikanorov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Carlos, > > Are you saying that we should only have a loadbalancer resource >> only in the case where we want it to span multiple L2 networks as if it >> were a router? I don't see how you arrived at that conclusion. Can you >> explain further. >> > No, I mean that loadbalancer instance is needed if we need several > *different* L2 endpoints for several front ends. > That's basically 'virtual appliance' functionality that we've discussed on > today's meeting. > > > From looking at the irc log it looks like nothing conclusive came out > of the meeting. I don't understand a lot of the conclusions you arrive at. > For example your rejecting the notion of a loadbalancer concrete object > unless its needed to include multi l2 network support. Will you make an > honest effort to describe your objections here in the ML cause if we can't > resolve it here its going to spill over into the summit. I certainly don't > want this to dominate the summit. > > > > Eugene. > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
